|#1917||1068||June 26, 2018||By Neha Dwivedi|
On the 70th anniversary of the United Nations, Russia President Vladimir Putin openly criticised “those that found themselves at the top of the pyramid after the cold war” and conveyed that Russia was prepared for action in the Middle East.[i] Almost two years since Russia intervened in Syria, there is a growing consensus that Russia is here to stay. From entering into defence deals to engaging in diplomatic maneuvering, Russia has demonstrated its will to stay in the region which continues to witness the predominance of the United States.
Russia’s High Risk Gamble in the Middle East
Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, with the help of Russia, has seized most of the territory that he had lost to the Islamic State and the rebel forces.[ii] At a time when questions were raised on America’s strategy in defeating the Islamic State, Russia, formed its own coalition, along with Iran, Syria and Iraq.[iii] Iran, over the course of war, emerged to become a crucial partner of Russia, particularly in its fight against rebels and jihadists. However, as Russia prepares to project its power beyond Syria, it appears that the country is engaging in a high risk gamble.
If certain media sources are to be believed, Russia is giving Israel a freehand in reducing Iran’s military presence in Syria.[iv] Following a meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Kremlin, Putin called for the withdrawal of Iranian forces including Lebanon based Hezbollah from Syria.[v] Additionally, Israel is using Syria’s airspace, which is controlled by Russia, for launching attacks against Iranian forces and Hezbollah.[vi] Interestingly, Russia has maintained a neutral response to the US-Turkey Manbij deal that calls for the removal of People’s Protection Units (YPG) from northern Syrian city of Manbij.[vii] While Russia’s official response to the deal has been moderate, the alleged strikes by Russia in the Idlib province on June 7 suggests that Russia would not hesitate to use force if situation runs out of control.[viii] Turkey was infuriated with the air strike which had the potential to expand the Syrian regime’s influence to Idlib.
Source: Nations Online Project based on a UN map, see http://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/map/syria-map.htm
Russia Playing it tactical to become a Strategic Player
The Russian made S-400 Surface-To-Air Missile system has found potential buyers in the Middle East. The growing popularity of the portable weapons system has not gone down well with the US which has been dissuading countries such as Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Qatar from signing weapons deals with Russia.[ix] David Schenker, the nominee to be Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs, advised them to avoid military purchases that would be “potentially sanctionable”. The US threats have not deterred Turkey, a key NATO member which has decided to proceed with S-400 deal with Russia.[x]
The importance of weapons has particularly increased in light of the US decision to sabotage the Iran nuclear deal. Additionally, Russia’s decision to sell weapons to countries that have been involved in proxy or direct conflict with each other reflects the country’s willingness to take risks. Qatar which has been involved in a bitter crisis with Saudi Arabia has been in the process of buying S-400.[xi] Saudi Arabia which itself has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) for purchasing a number of weapons, including S-400 from Russia has threatened Qatar with military actions if it acquires the same air weapon.[xii] Russia’s tactics to sell and divide may work in its favour as the country finds its way through the complicated and violent region called the Middle East.
The Two Way Balancing Act
Even as Russia tries to balance its game in the Middle East, it cannot undermine the decades of partnerships vis-a-vis the United States that have existed in the region. The vulnerability of the region while serving as an opportunity for Russia can become its biggest dilemma. While the mutually beneficial projects might serve the short term goal of Russia, to sustain in the long term, it would require the confidence of its traditional allies. As Russia plays the balancing act, it needs to assess the long term consequences of risking its relations with Iran for countries such as Israel and Saudi Arabia that share a decade long relationship with the U.S.
While the risks remain pertinent, Russia’s huge gamble may pay off in light of latest diplomatic and security decision taken by President Donald Trump. The fear of Iranian threat following the breakdown of the Iran nuclear deal and his decision to recognise Jerusalem as Israel’s capital may pursue the countries to pursue an alternate option - Russia. Even so, the countries may resort to a balancing act between the United States and Russia. In such a scenario, Russia runs the risk of being stuck in a two-way game.
[i]The 10 most important lines from Vladimir Putin’s UN speech, ranked”, The Medium, September 30, 2018, see https://medium.com/@dominicbasulto/the-10-most-important-lines-from-vladimir-putin-s-un-speech-ranked-129fbb777479 accessed on 17 June 2018.
[ii]Mara Karlin, “After 7 years of war, Assad has won in Syria. What’s next for Washington?”, The Brookings, February 13, 2018, see https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2018/02/13/after-7-years-of-war-assad-has-won-in-syria-whats-next-for-washington/ accessed on 17 June 2018.
[iii]“Iran, Iraq, Syria, Russia hold 'anti-terrorism' meet”, The New Arab, 19 April 2018, see https://www.alaraby.co.uk/english/news/2018/4/19/iran-iraq-syria-russia-hold-anti-terrorism-meet accessed on 17 June 2018.
[iv]“Israel source: Russia to back Israel against Iran in Syria”, The Middle East Monitor, May 29, 2018, see https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20180529-israel-source-russia-to-back-israel-against-iran-in-syria/ accessed on 17 June 2018.
[v]Michael Bachner, “Tehran rejects Russian call for Iranian forces to eventually leave Syria”, Times of Israel, May 21, 2018, see https://www.timesofisrael.com/tehran-rejects-russian-call-for-iranian-forces-to-eventually-leave-syria/ accessed on 17 June 2018.
[vi]Belinda Robinson, “Israel Fires Warning: Right Of 'total Freedom Of Action' In Syrian Airspace”, The Express, April 17, 2018, see https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/947145/Israel-airstrikes-in-Syria-missiles-against-Iran accessed on 17 June 2018.
[vii] Maxim A. Suchkov, “Moscow’s take on US-Turkey Manbij deal: Wait and see”, June 12, 2018, see http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2018/06/russia-take-us-turkey-manbij-deal-syria-wait-see.html#ixzz5Irviec68 accessed on 17 June 2018.
[viii]“Turkey and Russia exchange warnings over Syria's Idlib”, The National, January 10, 2018, see https://www.thenational.ae/world/mena/turkey-and-russia-exchange-warnings-over-syria-s-idlib-1.694264accessed on 17 June 2018.
[ix]“US State Dept nominee would warn Saudi, Qatar, Egypt against Russia military deals”, The Middle Monitor, East, January 15, 2018, see https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20180615-us-state-dept-nominee-would-warn-saudi-qatar-egypt-against-russia-military-deals/ accessed on 17 June 2018.
[x]“Turkey to Use Russia's S-400 Air Defense Systems If Necessary, Erdogan Says”, Sputnik News, June 13, 2018 see https://sputniknews.com/military/201806131065354188-turkey-use-russian-s-400/ accessed on 17 June 2018.
[xi]“Qatar in talks to buy Russia's S-400 systems: Tass”, The Reuters, January 21, 2018, see https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-qatar-military-hardware/qatar-in-talks-to-buy-russias-s-400-systems-tass-idUSKBN1FE0HP accessed on 17 June 2018
[xii]“Saudi Arabia threatens Qatar with military action over Russian missile deal: Report”, Middle East Eye, June 2, 2018 see http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/saudi-threatens-qatar-over-russian-missile-deal-1537444355 accessed on 17 June 2018.
Views expressed are of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the CLAWS or of the Government of India.